Topic summary
⁠59%1 analyzed article/video802 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Comparisons results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 425 hits. Analysis detected 2,450 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,208 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (9,798 of 21,995 topics). This Comparisons is worse (more manipulative) than 55.50% of the peer group.
Comparisons
Topic details
Total words: 3,208
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510055.5% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.3%13.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 8.5%8.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Horn Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos