Topic summary
⁠45%5 analyzed articles/videos2,652 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Community Leadership results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 848 hits. Analysis detected 6,045 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,608 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (16,263 of 24,024 topics). This Community Leadership is better (less manipulative) than 67.70% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

32% percentile
025507510032.3% percentile
1.8% BS Score5 analyzed articles10.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.3%5.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.5%Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos