Topic summary
⁠33%3 analyzed articles/videos884 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Comedy Shows results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 624 hits. Analysis detected 2,543 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,168 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (11,455 of 24,545 topics). This Comedy Shows is worse (more manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group.
Comedy Shows
Topic details
Total words: 4,168
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

53% percentile
025507510053.3% percentile
2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.0%15.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 7.1%7.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 0.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos