Topic summary
34%2 analyzed articles/videos2,559 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Climate Attribution results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 602 hits. Analysis detected 7,233 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,236 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 31% (15,956 of 22,927 topics). This Climate Attribution is better (less manipulative) than 69.60% of the peer group.
Climate Attribution
Topic details
Total words: 10,236
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

30% percentile
025507510030.4% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.9%5.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate