Topic summary
⁠25%2 analyzed articles/videos719 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Child Sexual Abuse Material results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 294 hits. Analysis detected 1,907 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,876 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (10,709 of 24,572 topics). This Child Sexual Abuse Material is worse (more manipulative) than 56.40% of the peer group.
Child Sexual Abuse Material
Topic details
Total words: 2,876
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510056.4% percentile
2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.2%10.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Tu Quoque: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos