Topic summary
69% 6 analyzed articles/videos 3,346 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cheating results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 1,312 hits . Analysis detected 12,108 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,264 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 35% (16,109 of 24,545 topics). This Cheating is better (less manipulative) than 65.60% of the peer group. Cheating
Topic details
Total words: 14,264
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.4% percentile 1.9% BS Score6 analyzed articles14.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst