Topic summary
⁠73%1 analyzed article/video1,466 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Centennial Mills Fire results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Ad Hominem, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 35.1% saturation with 2,058 hits. Analysis detected 7,166 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,864 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (5,784 of 23,618 topics). This Centennial Mills Fire is worse (more manipulative) than 75.50% of the peer group.
Centennial Mills Fire
Topic details
Total words: 5,864
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

76% percentile
025507510075.5% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 35.1%35.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.6%8.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 14.7%14.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 14.4%14.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.2%9.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 35.1%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 2.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Straw Man: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos