Topic summary
⁠85%1 analyzed article/video713 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cannabis Regulation results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Slippery Slope, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23% saturation with 657 hits. Analysis detected 2,506 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,852 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (7,923 of 24,545 topics). This Cannabis Regulation is worse (more manipulative) than 67.70% of the peer group.
Cannabis Regulation
Topic details
Total words: 2,852
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

68% percentile
025507510067.7% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 7.8%7.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 23.0%23.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 23.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos