Topic summary
59% 8 analyzed articles/videos 6,398 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Campaign Spending results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 2,575 hits . Analysis detected 17,751 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,573 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 17% (20,451 of 24,561 topics). This Campaign Spending is better (less manipulative) than 83.30% of the peer group. Campaign Spending
Topic details
Total words: 24,573
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.7% percentile 1.4% BS Score8 analyzed articles24.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst