Topic summary
67%2 analyzed articles/videos385 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Box Office Success results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Confirmation Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 584 hits. Analysis detected 3,238 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,352 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 49% (12,752 of 24,569 topics). This Box Office Success is better (less manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group.
Box Office Success
Topic details
Total words: 4,352
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

48% percentile
025507510048.1% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 13.4%13.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.3%7.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.7%2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.6%8.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.3%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos