Topic summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video662 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Boris Johnson Into Ukraines Kill Zone results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Overconfidence Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 29.4% saturation with 778 hits. Analysis detected 2,693 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,648 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (4,430 of 22,720 topics). This Boris Johnson Into Ukraines Kill Zone is worse (more manipulative) than 80.50% of the peer group.
Boris Johnson Into Ukraines Kill Zone
Topic details
Total words: 2,648
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

81% percentile
025507510080.5% percentile
4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 29.4%29.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 17.2%17.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.9%3.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 29.4%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Special Pleading: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos