Topic summary
⁠31%3 analyzed articles/videos2,363 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Border Wall Construction results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 5.2% saturation with 471 hits. Analysis detected 4,548 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,027 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (17,885 of 23,465 topics). This Border Wall Construction is better (less manipulative) than 76.20% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

24% percentile
025507510023.8% percentile
1.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos