Topic summary
74%1 analyzed article/video570 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bluetooth Technology results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 268 hits. Analysis detected 1,676 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,280 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 63% (9,291 of 24,545 topics). This Bluetooth Technology is worse (more manipulative) than 62.10% of the peer group.
Bluetooth Technology
Topic details
Total words: 2,280
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510062.1% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 7.9%7.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 11.8%11.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.0%3.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 0.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Bandwagon: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos