Topic summary
⁠70%5 analyzed articles/videos5,676 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Biohacking results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 2,508 hits. Analysis detected 21,026 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,704 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (17,525 of 24,470 topics). This Biohacking is better (less manipulative) than 71.60% of the peer group.
Biohacking

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

28% percentile
025507510028.4% percentile
1.7% BS Score5 analyzed articles22.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.8%7.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.1%11.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos