Topic summary
⁠64%1 analyzed article/video690 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Automated Systems results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 423 hits. Analysis detected 2,210 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,760 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (10,567 of 23,958 topics). This Automated Systems is worse (more manipulative) than 55.90% of the peer group.
Automated Systems
Topic details
Total words: 2,760
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510055.9% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 15.3%15.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.0%4.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Middle Ground: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos