Topic summary
46%4 analyzed articles/videos5,099 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Atlanta results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 2,476 hits. Analysis detected 16,649 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,708 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 36% (14,446 of 22,343 topics). This Atlanta is better (less manipulative) than 64.70% of the peer group.
Atlanta
Topic details
Total words: 20,708
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510035.3% percentile
2.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles20.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.0%12.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 7.8%7.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 2.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate