Topic summary
⁠53%3 analyzed articles/videos1,187 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Apple Watch results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Availability Heuristic, and Halo Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 620 hits. Analysis detected 3,331 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,748 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (10,867 of 23,550 topics). This Apple Watch is worse (more manipulative) than 53.90% of the peer group.
Apple Watch
Topic details
Total words: 4,748
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510053.9% percentile
2.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.0%3.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 13.1%13.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 9.3%9.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos