Topic summary
⁠35%1 analyzed article/video763 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Apple Maps results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Bandwagon, and Negativity Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 215 hits. Analysis detected 1,848 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,052 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (13,835 of 24,371 topics). This Apple Maps is better (less manipulative) than 56.80% of the peer group.
Apple Maps
Topic details
Total words: 3,052
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510043.2% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.0%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Bandwagon: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos