Topic summary
⁠16%1 analyzed article/video852 analyzed words
BS Summary: These American Jews results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 279 hits. Analysis detected 959 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,408 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (17,188 of 24,547 topics). This American Jews is better (less manipulative) than 70.00% of the peer group.
American Jews
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%4-H Schedule1%
⁠0%4 H Schedule1%
⁠0%Musician Biographies1%
⁠0%Class Analysis1%
⁠0%Cleveland Politics1%
⁠30%American Jews (selected)2%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,408
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

30% percentile
025507510030.0% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.2%8.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Middle Ground: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.1%Tu Quoque: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos