Topic summary
⁠80%2 analyzed articles/videos1,785 analyzed words
BS Summary: These AI Tools results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 793 hits. Analysis detected 7,932 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,140 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (10,228 of 22,091 topics). This AI Tools is worse (more manipulative) than 53.70% of the peer group.
AI Tools
Topic details
Total words: 7,140
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510053.7% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.1%9.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.8%10.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 11.1%11.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Straw Man: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos