Topic summary
⁠40%1 analyzed article/video900 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Access To Capital results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Anecdotal, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 304 hits. Analysis detected 1,825 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,600 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (14,894 of 24,545 topics). This Access To Capital is better (less manipulative) than 60.70% of the peer group.
Access To Capital
Topic details
Total words: 3,600
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510039.3% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.4%8.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.7%2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Red Herring: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos