Speaker summary
⁠66%3 analyzed articles/videos166 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Yu Zhen Story results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion, Negativity Bias, and Anecdotal, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 59.1% saturation with 105.793 hits. Analysis detected 276.223 faulty-reasoning hits from 166 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 22.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (27,908 of 45,460 speakers). This Yu Zhen Story is better (less manipulative) than 61.40% of the peer group.
Yu Zhen Story
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠39%Yu Zhen Story (selected)23%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 166
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

39% percentile
025507510038.6% percentile
22.5% BS Score3 analyzed videos166 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 59.1%59.1%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 35.3%35.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 12.3%12.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 14.2%14.2%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 6.4%6.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 7.6%7.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 59.1%, sitewide 15.9%Loss Aversion: Speaker 35.3%, sitewide 2.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 9.1%Slippery Slope: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos