Speaker summary
⁠85%1 analyzed article/video88.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wenhua Zhao results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Optimism Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 80.5% saturation with 95 hits. Analysis detected 196.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 88.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 43.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (16,709 of 45,460 speakers). This Wenhua Zhao is worse (more manipulative) than 63.20% of the peer group.
Wenhua Zhao
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠64%Wenhua Zhao (selected)44%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 88.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

63% percentile
025507510063.2% percentile
43.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos88.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 80.5%80.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 29.2%29.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 14.4%14.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 80.5%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Speaker 29.2%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos