Speaker summary
33% 3 analyzed articles/videos 8,116 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vivek Chibber results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 2.3% saturation with 204 hits . Analysis detected 2,379.461 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,116 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 0% (45,087 of 45,097 speakers). This Vivek Chibber is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Vivek Chibber
Speaker details
Total words: 8,116
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.9% BS Score3 analyzed videos8.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 0.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Speaker 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst