Speaker summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video28 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vincent J. Candelora results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) and Self-Serving Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 27 hits. Analysis detected 81 faulty-reasoning hits from 28 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (6,787 of 45,537 speakers). This Vincent J. Candelora is worse (more manipulative) than 85.10% of the peer group.
Vincent J. Candelora
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠86%Vincent J. Candelora (selected)100%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 28
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

85% percentile
025507510085.1% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos28 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos