Speaker summary
⁠58%2 analyzed articles/videos2,321.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Varina Winder results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Indoctrination, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 280 hits. Analysis detected 2,468.7 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,321.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (44,784 of 45,123 speakers). This Varina Winder is better (less manipulative) than 99.20% of the peer group.
Varina Winder
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠1%Varina Winder (selected)3%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 2,321.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

1% percentile
02550751000.8% percentile
2.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 10.0%10.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 5.6%5.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 1.5%1.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 1.9%1.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 6.5%6.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 3.1%3.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Primacy Effect: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 0.9%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos