Speaker summary
⁠49%1 analyzed article/video219 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vallery Stone results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 29.7% saturation with 77 hits. Analysis detected 211.091 faulty-reasoning hits from 219 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (32,498 of 45,133 speakers). This Vallery Stone is better (less manipulative) than 72.00% of the peer group.
Vallery Stone
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠28%Vallery Stone (selected)17%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 219
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

28% percentile
025507510028.0% percentile
16.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos219 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 29.7%29.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 17.0%17.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 17.1%17.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 10.0%10.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 10.0%10.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 29.7%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos