Speaker summary
⁠45%1 analyzed article/video69 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ukraine’s general staff results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Status Quo Bias, with Status Quo Bias as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 46 faulty-reasoning hits from 69 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (14,871 of 45,134 speakers). This Ukraine’s general staff is worse (more manipulative) than 67.10% of the peer group.
Ukraine’s general staff
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠68%Ukraine’s general staff (selected)50%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 69
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

67% percentile
025507510067.1% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos69 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos