Speaker summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video138 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tseming Yang results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Anchoring Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 28.986 hits. Analysis detected 106.986 faulty-reasoning hits from 138 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (37,714 of 45,128 speakers). This Tseming Yang is better (less manipulative) than 83.60% of the peer group.
Tseming Yang
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠17%Tseming Yang (selected)12%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 138
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

16% percentile
025507510016.4% percentile
11.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos138 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 20.1%20.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 13.0%13.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 10.1%10.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 7.3%7.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 7.3%7.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 20.1%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 4.0%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos