Speaker summary
⁠76%3 analyzed articles/videos129.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trinity Rodman results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Self-Serving Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 83.2% saturation with 121.125 hits. Analysis detected 281.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 129.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 41.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (17,256 of 45,145 speakers). This Trinity Rodman is worse (more manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group.
Trinity Rodman
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠62%Trinity Rodman (selected)42%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 129.333
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

62% percentile
025507510061.8% percentile
41.4% BS Score3 analyzed videos129.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 83.3%83.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 49.5%49.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 16.5%16.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 16.5%16.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%False Dilemma: Speaker 83.3%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Speaker 49.5%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 1.1%False DilemmaSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos