Speaker summary
⁠51%3 analyzed articles/videos155.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom Hanks results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 43.9% saturation with 94 hits. Analysis detected 355 faulty-reasoning hits from 155.667 analyzed words across 3 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 15.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (33,894 of 45,134 speakers). This Tom Hanks is better (less manipulative) than 75.10% of the peer group.
Tom Hanks
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠25%Tom Hanks (selected)16%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 155.667
Content count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

25% percentile
025507510024.9% percentile
15.3% BS Score3 analyzed videos155.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 43.9%43.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 22.0%22.0%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Speaker 18.0%18.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 22.0%22.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 2.5%2.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 34.1%34.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 3.5%3.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 5.6%5.6%Personal IncredulitySitewide 0.2%Speaker 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 9.5%9.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Speaker 43.9%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 34.1%, sitewide 26.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 22.0%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 22.0%, sitewide 5.3%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 18.0%, sitewide 0.3%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 1.5%Personal Incredulity: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos