Speaker summary
⁠42%1 analyzed article/video170.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tiago SimÔes results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 28.1% saturation with 36 hits. Analysis detected 68.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 170.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 22.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (27,216 of 44,318 speakers). This Tiago SimÔes is better (less manipulative) than 61.40% of the peer group.
Tiago SimÔes
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠39%Tiago SimÔes (selected)23%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 170.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

39% percentile
025507510038.6% percentile
22.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos170.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 28.1%28.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 17.0%17.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 28.1%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos