Speaker summary
⁠45%1 analyzed article/video60 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Theodora Weatherwax results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 40 hits. Analysis detected 80 faulty-reasoning hits from 60 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (14,618 of 44,558 speakers). This Theodora Weatherwax is worse (more manipulative) than 67.20% of the peer group.
Theodora Weatherwax
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠68%Theodora Weatherwax (selected)50%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 60
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

67% percentile
025507510067.2% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos60 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos