Speaker summary
⁠84%3 analyzed articles/videos112 analyzed words
BS Summary: These the Times results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Unattributed Quote, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 36.6% saturation with 41 hits. Analysis detected 167 faulty-reasoning hits from 112 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 29.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (22,686 of 45,115 speakers). This the Times is better (less manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group.
the Times
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠50%the Times (selected)30%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 112
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

50% percentile
025507510049.7% percentile
29.8% BS Score3 analyzed videos112 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 36.6%36.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 36.6%36.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 32.1%32.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 36.6%36.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 7.1%7.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 36.6%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 36.6%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 36.6%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 32.1%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 8.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos