Speaker summary
ā 43%1 analyzed article/video38.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tarik Khan results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect and Biased Writer Voice, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 34.5% saturation with 20 hits. Analysis detected 58 faulty-reasoning hits from 38.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.3% and a BS Rank of ā 54% (20,588 of 44,485 speakers). This Tarik Khan is worse (more manipulative) than 53.70% of the peer group.
Tarik Khan
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%Paul Heideman1%
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Conor Heffernan1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Katy Longshore1%
ā 54%Tarik Khan (selected)34%
ā 100%291 Brewhouse100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%2035 Initiative100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
ā 100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 38.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

54% percentile
025507510053.7% percentile
33.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos38.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 34.5%34.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 31.0%31.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 34.5%34.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 34.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing Effect: Speaker 34.5%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 31.0%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos