Speaker summary
63%3 analyzed articles/videos69 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Talarico results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.1% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 119 faulty-reasoning hits from 69 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 21.6% and a BS Rank of 37% (28,498 of 45,133 speakers). This Talarico is better (less manipulative) than 63.10% of the peer group.
Talarico
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
37%Talarico (selected)22%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 69
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

37% percentile
025507510036.9% percentile
21.6% BS Score3 analyzed videos69 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 17.4%17.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 18.5%18.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 17.4%17.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 26.1%26.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Speaker 26.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 18.5%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Speaker 17.4%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 17.4%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate