Speaker summary
⁠86%1 analyzed article/video66.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stefan Moritz results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 61.8% saturation with 68 hits. Analysis detected 276.453 faulty-reasoning hits from 66.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 60% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (10,331 of 45,145 speakers). This Stefan Moritz is worse (more manipulative) than 77.10% of the peer group.
Stefan Moritz
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠78%Stefan Moritz (selected)60%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 66.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

77% percentile
025507510077.1% percentile
60.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos66.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 61.8%61.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 74.5%74.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 61.8%61.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 80.9%80.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 30.9%30.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Framing Effect: Speaker 80.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 74.5%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 61.8%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 61.8%, sitewide 2.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 30.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos