Speaker summary
⁠40%3 analyzed articles/videos47.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These State Department officials results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Halo Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 37.9% saturation with 11 hits. Analysis detected 44 faulty-reasoning hits from 47.5 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 37.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (17,998 of 43,703 speakers). This State Department officials is worse (more manipulative) than 58.80% of the peer group.
State Department officials
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠59%State Department officials (selected)38%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 47.5
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

59% percentile
025507510058.8% percentile
37.9% BS Score3 analyzed videos47.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 37.9%37.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 37.9%37.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 37.9%37.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 37.9%37.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 37.9%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 37.9%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Speaker 37.9%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 37.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos