Speaker summary
⁠73%1 analyzed article/video200 analyzed words
BS Summary: These SAVE results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Indoctrination, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 24% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 157 faulty-reasoning hits from 200 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (33,694 of 45,320 speakers). This SAVE is better (less manipulative) than 74.30% of the peer group.
SAVE
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠26%SAVE (selected)16%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 200
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

26% percentile
025507510025.7% percentile
15.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos200 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 20.5%20.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 14.0%14.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 14.0%14.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 24.0%24.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 24.0%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 20.5%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 4.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos