Speaker summary
ā 81%1 analyzed article/video102.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Saul Anuzis results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 63% saturation with 97 hits. Analysis detected 537.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 102.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 29.2% and a BS Rank of ā 49% (22,831 of 44,667 speakers). This Saul Anuzis is better (less manipulative) than 51.10% of the peer group.
Saul Anuzis
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%Paul Heideman1%
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Conor Heffernan1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Katy Longshore1%
ā 49%Saul Anuzis (selected)30%
ā 100%291 Brewhouse100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%2035 Initiative100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
ā 100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 102.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

49% percentile
025507510048.9% percentile
29.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos102.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“75%
0.0%20%40%60%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 62.3%62.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 63.0%63.0%Politically Right Leaningā€¦Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 41.9%41.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 33.8%33.8%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 33.8%33.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 28.6%28.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 31.8%31.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 25.3%25.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 14.9%14.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 14.9%14.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 63.0%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 62.3%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 41.9%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 33.8%, sitewide 3.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 33.8%, sitewide 26.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 33.8%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 31.8%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Speaker 28.6%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 25.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 14.9%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 14.9%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 14.9%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 2.5%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos