Speaker summary
⁠35%1 analyzed article/video173.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Samantha Mitchell results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 37 hits. Analysis detected 97 faulty-reasoning hits from 173.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 22.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (27,987 of 45,145 speakers). This Samantha Mitchell is better (less manipulative) than 62.00% of the peer group.
Samantha Mitchell
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠38%Samantha Mitchell (selected)23%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 173.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

38% percentile
025507510038.0% percentile
22.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos173.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 24.8%24.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 24.8%24.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 17.1%17.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 24.8%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 24.8%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos