Speaker summary
⁠33%1 analyzed article/video61 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rogelio Segovia results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, Indoctrination, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 37.1% saturation with 39 hits. Analysis detected 156 faulty-reasoning hits from 61 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 37.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (18,956 of 45,088 speakers). This Rogelio Segovia is worse (more manipulative) than 58.00% of the peer group.
Rogelio Segovia
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠58%Rogelio Segovia (selected)38%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 61
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

58% percentile
025507510058.0% percentile
37.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos61 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 37.1%37.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 37.1%37.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 37.1%37.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 37.1%37.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 37.1%, sitewide 11.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 37.1%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 37.1%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 37.1%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos