Speaker summary
⁠37%1 analyzed article/video81.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rodrigo Santiago results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Availability Heuristic, and Halo Effect, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 27.9% saturation with 34 hits. Analysis detected 190 faulty-reasoning hits from 81.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 26% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (24,611 of 44,169 speakers). This Rodrigo Santiago is better (less manipulative) than 55.70% of the peer group.
Rodrigo Santiago
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠45%Rodrigo Santiago (selected)26%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 81.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

44% percentile
025507510044.3% percentile
26.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos81.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 27.9%27.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 22.1%22.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 27.9%27.9%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 22.1%22.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 27.9%27.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 27.9%27.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Speaker 27.9%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 27.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 27.9%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 27.9%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 22.1%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 22.1%, sitewide 1.9%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos