Speaker summary
⁠74%1 analyzed article/video219 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robert Mann results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 29.8% saturation with 98 hits. Analysis detected 647.794 faulty-reasoning hits from 219 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (36,769 of 45,134 speakers). This Robert Mann is better (less manipulative) than 81.50% of the peer group.
Robert Mann
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠19%Robert Mann (selected)13%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 219
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

19% percentile
025507510018.5% percentile
12.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos219 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 27.7%27.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 29.8%29.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 9.4%9.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 25.4%25.4%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 16.5%16.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 1.8%1.8%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 11.6%11.6%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Speaker 8.2%8.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 7.6%7.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 8.2%8.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 29.8%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 27.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 25.4%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 19.2%Composition/Division: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 0.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 7.5%Slippery Slope: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 0.8%Halo Effect: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 6.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 0.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos