Speaker summary
⁠58%2 analyzed articles/videos100.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robert Bauman results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 32.4% saturation with 35.188 hits. Analysis detected 105.188 faulty-reasoning hits from 100.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 19.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (30,219 of 45,145 speakers). This Robert Bauman is better (less manipulative) than 66.90% of the peer group.
Robert Bauman
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠34%Robert Bauman (selected)20%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 100.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

33% percentile
025507510033.1% percentile
19.5% BS Score2 analyzed videos100.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 32.4%32.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 18.8%18.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 13.0%13.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 13.6%13.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Speaker 32.4%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Speaker 18.8%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos