Speaker summary
⁠54%1 analyzed article/video56 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ramsey results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 66.7% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 168 faulty-reasoning hits from 56 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 40% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (17,931 of 45,569 speakers). This Ramsey is worse (more manipulative) than 60.70% of the peer group.
Ramsey
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠61%Ramsey (selected)40%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 56
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

61% percentile
025507510060.7% percentile
40.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos56 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 66.7%66.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 33.3%33.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 66.7%, sitewide 15.9%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 4.0%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos