Speaker summary
⁠92%1 analyzed article/video45 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Phi Lambda Rho Sorority, Inc. results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anecdotal, and Negativity Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 60 hits. Analysis detected 195 faulty-reasoning hits from 45 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 70% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (8,525 of 44,429 speakers). This Phi Lambda Rho Sorority, Inc. is worse (more manipulative) than 80.80% of the peer group.
Phi Lambda Rho Sorority, Inc.
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠81%Phi Lambda Rho Sorority, Inc. (selected)70%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 45
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

81% percentile
025507510080.8% percentile
70.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos45 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Halo Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos