Speaker summary
⁠92%1 analyzed article/video66 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pharmaceutical Product Stewardship Work Group results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Optimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 66 hits. Analysis detected 150 faulty-reasoning hits from 66 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 65.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (9,360 of 45,063 speakers). This Pharmaceutical Product Stewardship Work Group is worse (more manipulative) than 79.20% of the peer group.
Pharmaceutical Product Stewardship Work Group
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠80%Pharmaceutical Product Stewardship Work Group (selected)66%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 66
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

79% percentile
025507510079.2% percentile
65.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos66 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 61.5%61.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 61.5%61.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 38.5%38.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 61.5%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 61.5%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 38.5%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos