Speaker summary
⁠39%2 analyzed articles/videos2,426.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Sterne results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 161.947 hits. Analysis detected 1,976.629 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,426.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (43,514 of 43,608 speakers). This Peter Sterne is better (less manipulative) than 99.80% of the peer group.
Peter Sterne
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠1%Peter Sterne (selected)2%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 2,426.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

0% percentile
02550751000.2% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed videos2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 1.2%1.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 3.0%3.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Composition/Division: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.2%Loss Aversion: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Straw Man: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 0.9%Bandwagon: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos