Speaker summary
76%1 analyzed article/video95.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pete Browne results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Representativeness Heuristic as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 35 hits. Analysis detected 157.441 faulty-reasoning hits from 95.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 27.6% and a BS Rank of 47% (24,018 of 45,088 speakers). This Pete Browne is better (less manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group.
Pete Browne
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
47%Pete Browne (selected)28%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 95.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

47% percentile
025507510046.7% percentile
27.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos95.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 69.4%69.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 30.6%30.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 18.6%18.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 20.6%20.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 18.1%18.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Speaker 69.4%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 30.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 8.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos